Tutor Icon  Request A Tutor
Adorno

Why might Theodor W. Adorno deny photography the status of an artwork?

I should firstly say that Adorno would never deny any medium in its entirety the possibility of becoming art. However, the extent to which Adorno denies photography and film the status of an artwork refers to the manner in which what he refers to as the ‘culture industry’ invokes the technical constitution and possibilities of these mediums. The culture industry refers to a particular development of industrial society wherein people are compelled to seek relaxation in order to restore the labor-power spent in the alienated process of production. This need is the mass basis of culture industry and on it has arisen powerful amusement and entertainment industries, which adopt the mediums of photography and film. Here, aesthetic taste and receptivity have become predigested and standardized, and as such, art, as a means of filling out leisure time, has become entertainment. His critique of the culture industry is directed at the claim objectively made by its products to be aesthetic formations and thus representations of truth.

For Adorno, the truth of a work of art consists in its aesthetic autonomy, or in its ability to express freedom from that which is merely the case. The theme of Aesthetic Theory (1970) asks how can something be more than what it factually is? This is the artwork’s utopian content. Adorno answers this question by positing art as a critique of domination, a critique of the rationally destructive social whole through a non-discursive presentation of truth. Art’s constituent elements are drawn from the ideal of humanity as freedom. Through its form, art expresses an unease at fulfilling a social function, use, or intention. Through aesthetic autonomy, artworks detach themselves from the empirical world and bring forth another, or at least the possibility of another. Since human freedom exists beyond need or survival, artworks oppose reality to the extent that this structure of mere self-preservation or utility has emerged as the barbaric content of contemporary reality.

However, art’s rejection of the empirical world nonetheless sanctions the primacy of reality and asserts something in its detachment. In this way, art both turns against what exists and comes to its aid by giving form to its elements. Said another way, artworks communicate with the materials of reality, yet also negate the rational determinations stamped upon the empirical world. If rationality has dominated nature, art invokes the possibility of reconciling this subordination by conceding truth to the object and thereby reinstating nature. Adorno refers to this as ‘the domination of the dominating’, or as ‘the social antithesis of society’. By virtue of its “uselessness,” its wish to be solely for-itself and to elude the laws of universal exchange, the artwork frees nature from its role as a mere instrument or means.

In glaring contrast, the culture industry subsumes the purposelessness of art into the realm of purpose. For Adorno, the mediums of photography and film drag art from its immanent purposiveness to the purposes of the culture industry. These mediums then elicit mass psychological behavior, that is, a form of pathological projection and identification in which people strive to adapt to models and stereotypes. This is accompanied by a set of standardized reactions.

For Adorno, the resulting reification of the audience is a degradation of human perception. It does this, first and foremost, through a certain domesticated naturalism for which the photographic image is disposed, infusing empirical life with false meaning: “the duplicity of which viewers can scarcely see through because the nightclub looks exactly like the one they know.” The continuous presentation of what exists is the sole possible horizon. ‘Such a photological proof is of course not stringent, but it is overpowering.’ The ideology of the culture industry therefore has the world as such as its subject. ‘It exploits the cult of fact by describing bad existence with utmost exactitude in order to elevate it into the realm of facts. Through such elevation existence itself becomes a surrogate of meaning and justice. Beauty is whatever the camera reproduces.’ This ‘pseudo-realism’ as Adorno refers to it, resides in the limited sensuality of the photographic image. The limited resources of photography consist in the lack of spatial depth, of absolute scale, and the absence of movement or dynamism, which, must be instead hallucinated and projected by the observer. We give the photographs content it doesn’t have. Within the infinite abundance of information residing in a photograph, the ability to extract significance out of the tiniest detail of sensorial content is thoroughly obstructed. As a mode of sensorial deprivation, the detail of the photograph expresses less the residue of of the free human hand, than the technical imperatives of the camera and of photochemical processes and pixel saturation. In contrast, within a painting for example, the human trace is abundantly contained within the tiniest detail, the result bearing no relation to normal calculations of means and ends.

Within a photo, the wandering eye is obliged to compete with the situation depicted. Photographic details are always completely defined by the purpose they serve within the schema. For Adorno, this formula exemplifies the domination of universals over the particulars, of society over its members. Unlike a painting, photography will not put the eye to work. Everything is reduced to recognition, therefore stunting the power of discernment. Within photography, there is an absolute emaciation of perception. Photography becomes a substitute for the contemplative or reflective act of observation. Instead, photography amounts to a mechanical process that leaves little room for imagination. At best, photography is a means of communication, journalism, or reportage, not that of aesthetic construction.

Film of course follows the pseudo-realism of photography and equally speaks to this immaturity of experience by accommodating various layers of behavioral response patterns. The effects of film are specifically designed for the unconscious, eluding the control of the conscious ego as the product prescribes each reaction through signals. Here, the spectator accustoms his senses to a new tempo of the moving image and its narrative, one in which developments emerge from the directly preceding situation, not from any idea of the whole.

Further, the culture industry trains its audience to identity film directly with reality. The more densely and completely its techniques duplicate empirical objects, the more easily it creates the illusion that the world outside is a seamless extension of the one which has been revealed in the cinema. In this way, the culture industry is geared to mimetic regression, to the manipulation of repressed impulses to copy. Its method is to anticipate the spectator’s imitation of itself, making it appear as if the agreement already exists which it intends to create. ‘Immediacy, the popular community concocted by films, amounts to mediation without residue, reducing men and everything human so perfectly to things, that their contrast to things, indeed the spell of reification itself, becomes imperceptible.’ The film succeeds in transforming subjects so indistinguishably into social functions, that those wholly encompassed, no longer aware of any conflict, enjoy their own dehumanization as something human, as the joy of warmth.

The physiognomy of the culture industry is essentially a mixture of streamlining, photographic hardness and precision on the one hand, and an individual’s pathological identification with standardized formulas and clichés on the other. Here, ideology is split between the photographing of brute existence and the blatant lie about its meaning, a lie which is not articulated directly but drummed in by suggestion. Within the culture industry, art adopts the meaning of entertainment itself: as society’s apologia. To be entertained means to be in agreement. The culture industry replaces artistic form with representational function and the packaging of standardized models. The entire system is justified on the basis of an infantile public which it itself has created.

This process has abolished aesthetic autonomy that, for Adorno, presupposes purposelessness and a rejection of instrumentality. After all, when culture is culture (rather than industry), it arises out of the capacity to suspend purpose and constitute the idea of freedom. The true subject in art must be the work and that which speaks through the work, not the artist’s intentions nor the work’s subject-matter. In this way, artworks invite imaginative reflection. The capacity to think, the power of concentration, itself depends on its object and the coherence of its particulars. The truth of the artwork depends on the tempo, the patience and perseverance of lingering with the particular, a faculty obstructed through the entertainment of the culture industry. The culture industry asks artworks to do away with the truth of their objectivity for the sake of a laboring subject disposed to adapt themselves to the social whole.

1. Adorno, Theodor W. ‘Television as Ideology’, in Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Tr. H. W. Pickford. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. p.62.

2. Adorno, Theodor W. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Tr. E. W. Jephcott. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2002. p.118.

3. Ibid, p.119.

4. Adorno, Theodor W. Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. Tr. E. Jephcott. London: Verso, 2005. p.206.

LETS STUDY FOR YOUR EXAM TOGETHER

 
Melodie Argi
Melodie Argi
08:14 18 Oct 19
Tavistock tutors is by far the best tutor agency is London. The tutor selection is of the highest quality. Handpicked from the British intellectual elite in all sorts of disciplines. The staff is wonderfully helpful as well as being extremely attentive to feedback.read more
Henry Smith
Henry Smith
22:27 17 Oct 19
I have been employed as a tutor with Tavistock Tutors for over 5 years. I tutor mathematics and also help people with job preparation for different career routes (cv, cover letter, interview preparation and online test prep). They are simply a wonderful team of individuals who work collectively and strive to deliver the best possible service to both clients and their tutors. They work doggedly to achieve results. They are particularly honest and their feedback to tutors on how to improve is tailored, concise and always highly constructive. Even after 5 yrs, they only put me forward as a tutor if they think I am the absolute best they can find otherwise they are honest with me and explain why I was not put forward. I think this transparency is a huge reason for their success and keeps the best tutors on their books for years. Their communication on what a client wants is also clinically precise and effective and the team go out of their way to provide potential interests/passions of the client to help the tutor prepare accordingly for the lessons and nurture that interaction. Simply the finest agency and I have tutored with some of the best. World-class tutors and utmost confidentiality with respect to their clientele. I cannot be happier to work for them, a dream job with a team whose capacity for kindness, empathy and boundless intellect never ceases to amaze me. Their work ethic inspires me to relentlessly push myself to be a better tutor with their encouragement and constructive feedback.read more
Albert Tam
Albert Tam
20:50 17 Oct 19
Best tutors in London! Great experience and amazing customer service. Highly recommend, my tutors were all fantastic and a huge help. Really recommend Tavistock Tutors as I never had to worry about not getting the highest quality tutors unlike other agencies and online tutors.read more
I ME
I ME
16:13 17 Oct 19
I’ve used Tavistock multiple times and they never disappoint! I used them for myself secondary school, whilst at university and even now whilst working. Their service is second to none as are their tutors. I highly recommend them to anyone looking to better themselves academically or personally.read more
STAVROS MOUSLOPOULOS
STAVROS MOUSLOPOULOS
13:22 06 Oct 19
Why most reviewers have one contribution, namely to the Tavistock Tutors? High standards ? Mate get a real job rather than living off other's qualifications. Reality Check (See photos attached - that is the owner “looking for me” 1.5 years after leaving London and while my name and photo was on first page of Tavistock Tutor website...)read more
Jonathan Aaron
Jonathan Aaron
16:39 01 Aug 19
Amazing experience, the tutor was reliable, knowledgeable and reasonably priced and the company was both professional and reliable. Definitely will be using them again!read more
David T
David T
16:34 01 Aug 19
I used Tavistock for some Corporate Finance and Financial Modelling training at my firm. They were extremely helpful and the trainer, Simon, was of top quality, experience and charged a fair price. Thank you!read more
Olivia Pluss
Olivia Pluss
11:05 13 Jun 19
I had a fantastic experience with my tutor Elena and Tavistock Tutors. They were very well organized and made the entire experience so seamless and easy for me. I passed my assignment with great marks and the experience was much less stressful than if I had tried to complete the assignment without Elena's help.read more
J Mathews
J Mathews
11:27 22 May 19
My child used Glenda for HL biology. Glenda was outstanding. I would not hesitate to recommend her. Extremely intelligent, always prepared, knows how to teach/very helpful, and also just a nice person. Also, I would use Tavistock again for sure because we had such success with Glenda.read more
Alan Radford
Alan Radford
09:34 09 May 19
Tavistock Tutors were a delight to deal with, and highly professional at all times. They provided my daughter with an excellent tutor at very short notice - after my having approached them on a Thursday urgently requesting a tutor for that weekend. Tavistock Tutors immediately gave the matter their attention; they appreciated the urgency and responded quickly and efficiently, and helped to set my daughter up with exactly the right sort of tutor. Fantastic!read more
Sophie Taieb
Sophie Taieb
12:55 29 Mar 19
Very happy with Tavistock tutors services. They provide a wide range of tutors, from all backgrounds and for all types of needs. My uni son needed some help in research and methodology. We found a perfectly suited tutor in less than 3 days. He is very knowledgeable, punctual, open minded and brings the support needed to my son. I would definitely recommend Tavistock tutorsread more
Next Reviews
 

How to memorise quotes – (great for closed book exams!)

Memorising quotes can be a crucial element to your GCSE and A-level exams, so mastering the skill can be essential. Being able to use quotes in your written responses is a sure way to get marks fo...

How to choose quotes to learn for English GCSE

We know that learning quotes for a closed-book exam can be daunting, difficult and boring – especially when you’ve already been studying the text for an entire year. In our article ‘Do I need ...

Do I need to memorise quotes for English GCSE?

With the new GCSE specifications released in 2015, most English Literature GCSE exams have now become closed-book exams.

But what does this mean?

This means that in your exam, you won...

Call Now Button