Tutor Icon  Request A Tutor

Is perfect competition really perfect?

For those of you who don’t know, perfect competition is a hypothetical market structure in economic theory. A market structure refers the way in which we categorise a market depending on a set of defining conditions. One you may certainly have heard of is a ‘monopoly’, a market structure where the defining condition is that there is only one seller of a good or service. The defining conditions in a perfectly competitive market structure are:

1. Many buyers and many sellers (Unlike a monopoly, where there is only one seller)
2. Perfect information (Everyone in the market knows everything about everything; prices, sellers, production, attributes of the good in question)
3. Homogeneous product (Essentially means the product sold is identical in every way amongst sellers)

Whilst there are others, these are the most important for this piece, and without getting into the maths or thorny details, these conditions enable us to conclude that in such a market all firms would set an identical market price where supply meets demand and welfare is maximised.

This is deduced through an economic term called efficiency, which can mean several different things but can generally be taken to have positive connotations! Again, without wanting to drag you down with technical detail, once modelled a perfectly competitive market is seen to be highly economically efficient; for example, theoretically it maximises welfare and production potential in the long-run.

The interesting part is how economists and policy makers have often used this model as a benchmark. What I mean by this is that they know markets like this do not exist in the real world (largely because perfect information is near-impossible), but use this theoretically ‘perfect’ market as the standard to aim for. The thinking is that if we make real-world markets as close to this as possible, we will maximise efficiency, making us all happier and wealthier-hooray!

Of course, it is not nearly so simple. This article is really about discussing the trap we often fall into in Economics; thinking that a relatively simple1 and purely hypothetical model is an appropriate way to understand real-world markets and influence our decisions in managing both the economy and individual markets. So, let’s consider whether the above model of ‘perfect’ competition, where firms have identical products, prices and perfect information, will really result in something that delivers a ‘perfect outcome’.

Firstly, if we consider how a real perfectly competitive economy would look, then price-cutting and price wars between firms would cease to exist, as would branding, advertising, and every other means of product differentiation. This is because if the products are identical, there is no point branding or advertising them. Consumers also have perfect information, so they know that there is zero reason to choose one product over another based-on brand or advertising. As discussed, firms have identical prices so out go those frequent supermarket price wars! The point is that when we think of a competitive market we think of these actions; firms neck-and-neck in the race for consumers wallets, lots of different quality products with great variability in design and marketing campaigns.

A ‘perfectly’ competitive market thus sounds boring in comparison; firms don’t really compete with each other. There is no point as they can’t change prices or make their product seem better. They just sit there all selling the exact same thing at the exact same price!

Secondly, this would effectively mean the only form of competition we would see firms use in the chase for profit would be cost-cutting. This means when you try and reduce costs to make more money than your rivals in the market. An example might be research and development, where a firm tries to discover a new or cheaper way of making a product.

However, we must question whether even this form of everyday competition would occur in ‘perfect’ competition, as with perfect information any firm that spends money or effort finding a way to cut costs would enable all other firms to discover the same cost-cutting method (because everyone in the market knows about everything in the market), so profits would be minimal and temporary, leading to a lack of incentive to cut-costs in the first place. In simple terms, no firm would bother researching anything themselves because there would be no point if every other company gets immediate access to the same method. So, there would be no iPod, because Mr Jobs would have never bothered to develop the device if he thought Microsoft would then immediately be able to do the same thing. It begins to seem that actually a lack of perfectly competitive market conditions makes markets more ‘real-world’ competitive!

Additionally, from the perspective of a consumer things are pretty bleak. Thousands of options but each completely identical? This also does not sound like what we think of as a competitive market, it might as well be a monopoly broken up into lots of little suppliers instead of one big one. The good might be cheaper, there might be more of it, but there is no real choice.

In summary, we are arguing that the classic model of an efficient ‘perfect’ competition structure might, if applied literally, actually be a terrible example of a competitive market by the measures we use in real life. Suppliers would not ‘compete’ in any real-world sense, and buyers would not get a sense of a competitive market either, as all goods are identical. It is also simply interesting to look at the gap between what we can do with economic models, and what real life tells us markets are actually like. Perhaps it begs the question as to how Economists are so highly-regarded in policy-making when such flaws in our models exist?
I think this also has use as an argument in A-level studies, particularly when evaluating market structures, which is a very important skill at A-level. Essentially, perfect competition is seen as desirable over imperfect competition, for a range of different mathematical efficiency criteria. However, if we apply the concept to the real world rather than a mathematical diagram, we may instead find that perfect competition would fail to be at all desirable.

Relatively simple, that is, compared to the thing it is attempting to model

LETS STUDY FOR YOUR EXAM TOGETHER

 
Melodie Argi
Melodie Argi
08:14 18 Oct 19
Tavistock tutors is by far the best tutor agency is London. The tutor selection is of the highest quality. Handpicked from the British intellectual elite in all sorts of disciplines. The staff is wonderfully helpful as well as being extremely attentive to feedback.read more
Henry Smith
Henry Smith
22:27 17 Oct 19
I have been employed as a tutor with Tavistock Tutors for over 5 years. I tutor mathematics and also help people with job preparation for different career routes (cv, cover letter, interview preparation and online test prep). They are simply a wonderful team of individuals who work collectively and strive to deliver the best possible service to both clients and their tutors. They work doggedly to achieve results. They are particularly honest and their feedback to tutors on how to improve is tailored, concise and always highly constructive. Even after 5 yrs, they only put me forward as a tutor if they think I am the absolute best they can find otherwise they are honest with me and explain why I was not put forward. I think this transparency is a huge reason for their success and keeps the best tutors on their books for years. Their communication on what a client wants is also clinically precise and effective and the team go out of their way to provide potential interests/passions of the client to help the tutor prepare accordingly for the lessons and nurture that interaction. Simply the finest agency and I have tutored with some of the best. World-class tutors and utmost confidentiality with respect to their clientele. I cannot be happier to work for them, a dream job with a team whose capacity for kindness, empathy and boundless intellect never ceases to amaze me. Their work ethic inspires me to relentlessly push myself to be a better tutor with their encouragement and constructive feedback.read more
Albert Tam
Albert Tam
20:50 17 Oct 19
Best tutors in London! Great experience and amazing customer service. Highly recommend, my tutors were all fantastic and a huge help. Really recommend Tavistock Tutors as I never had to worry about not getting the highest quality tutors unlike other agencies and online tutors.read more
I ME
I ME
16:13 17 Oct 19
I’ve used Tavistock multiple times and they never disappoint!I used them for myself secondary school, whilst at university and even now whilst working. Their service is second to none as are their tutors.I highly recommend them to anyone looking to better themselves academically or personally.read more
STAVROS MOUSLOPOULOS
STAVROS MOUSLOPOULOS
13:22 06 Oct 19
Why most reviewers have one contribution, namely to the Tavistock Tutors?High standards ? Mate get a real job rather than living off other's qualifications.Reality Check(See photos attached - that is the owner “looking for me” 1.5 years after leaving London and while my name and photo was on first page of Tavistock Tutor website...)read more
Jonathan Aaron
Jonathan Aaron
16:39 01 Aug 19
Amazing experience, the tutor was reliable, knowledgeable and reasonably priced and the company was both professional and reliable. Definitely will be using them again!read more
David T
David T
16:34 01 Aug 19
I used Tavistock for some Corporate Finance and Financial Modelling training at my firm. They were extremely helpful and the trainer, Simon, was of top quality, experience and charged a fair price. Thank you!read more
Olivia Pluss
Olivia Pluss
11:05 13 Jun 19
I had a fantastic experience with my tutor Elena and Tavistock Tutors. They were very well organized and made the entire experience so seamless and easy for me. I passed my assignment with great marks and the experience was much less stressful than if I had tried to complete the assignment without Elena's help.read more
J Mathews
J Mathews
11:27 22 May 19
My child used Glenda for HL biology. Glenda was outstanding. I would not hesitate to recommend her. Extremely intelligent, always prepared, knows how to teach/very helpful, and also just a nice person. Also, I would use Tavistock again for sure because we had such success with Glenda.read more
Alan Radford
Alan Radford
09:34 09 May 19
Tavistock Tutors were a delight to deal with, and highly professional at all times. They provided my daughter with an excellent tutor at very short notice - after my having approached them on a Thursday urgently requesting a tutor for that weekend. Tavistock Tutors immediately gave the matter their attention; they appreciated the urgency and responded quickly and efficiently, and helped to set my daughter up with exactly the right sort of tutor. Fantastic!read more
Sophie Taieb
Sophie Taieb
12:55 29 Mar 19
Very happy with Tavistock tutors services. They provide a wide range of tutors, from all backgrounds and for all types of needs. My uni son needed some help in research and methodology. We found a perfectly suited tutor in less than 3 days. He is very knowledgeable, punctual, open minded and brings the support needed to my son. I would definitely recommend Tavistock tutorsread more
Next Reviews
 

How to memorise quotes – (great for closed book exams!)

Memorising quotes can be a crucial element to your GCSE and A-level exams, so mastering the skill can be essential.Being able to use quotes in your written responses is a sure way to get marks fo...

How to choose quotes to learn for English GCSE

We know that learning quotes for a closed-book exam can be daunting, difficult and boring – especially when you’ve already been studying the text for an entire year. In our article ‘Do I need ...

Do I need to memorise quotes for English GCSE?

With the new GCSE specifications released in 2015, most English Literature GCSE exams have now become closed-book exams.

But what does this mean?

This means that in your exam, you won...

Call Now Button